Could anyone suggest a free software for meta analysis. Healthcare decisions should be based on all relevant evidence. A network meta analysis combines multiple studies and makes statistical comparisons in a similar manner. An introduction to network metaanalysis mixed treatment.
Network meta analysis nma a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments in the same meta analysis simultaneously has become increasingly popular in the medical literature in recent years. The r package we will use to do this is the gemtc package valkenhoef et al. It has usually been performed in a bayesian setting, but recently it has become possible in a frequentist setting using multivariate meta analysis and meta. However, a network meta analysis may exhibit inconsistency, whereby the treatment effect estimates do not agree across all trial designs, even after taking betweenstudy heterogeneity into. This article relies on part 1 of the report 1 for motivation, concepts, and a variety of definitions e. The winbugs software can be called from either r provided r2winbugs as an r package or stata software for network meta analysis. Frequentist methods for network meta analysis r package netmeta advanced methods to model and adjust for bias in meta analysis r package metasens.
Which software can create a network metaanalysis for free. Network metaanalysis of heart failure prevention by. Mixed treatment comparison proposed by lu and ades as an improvement of network metaanalysis from lumley. The first is meta analysis of clinical trials taking into account indirect as well as direct comparisons. Indirect comparison meta analysis methods also called network meta analyses, in particular when multiple treatments are assessed simultaneously generally use two main methodologies. Ispor 0, ispor 1, ispor 2 evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta analysis. When multiple interventions have been used and compared for the same disease and outcomes, network meta analysis also commonly referred to as a multiple treatment comparison meta analysis or mixed treatment meta analysis offers a set of methods to visualize and interpret the wider picture of the evidence and to understand the relative merits of these multiple interventions.
Network metaanalysis is a powerful approach for synthesizing direct and. Network metaanalysis incorporating challenges and opportunities. Mixed models under complex sampling and maybe network models, too. Jul 14, 2017 network meta analysis overcomes the limitations of traditional pairwise meta analysis by incorporating all available evidence into a general statistical framework for simultaneous comparisons of several treatments. Meta analysis and network meta analysis are only as good as the studies they are based on. Network metaanalysishighly attractive but more methodological. Prediction intervals for randomeffects meta analysis 414 where t k 2 is the 1001 2 percentile of the tdistribution with k 2 degrees of freedom. Software for network metaanalysis general purpose software. The metaanalysis function of jasp is based on the aforementioned metafor r package.
Gemtc r package bayesian netmeta r package frequentist. Description usage arguments details value authors see also examples. Indirect treatment comparisonnetwork metaanalysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to. The statistical method has been available since 2002 3, 4 and owes its origins to much earlier work 5, 6. Welton june 25, 2012 abstract mixed treatment comparison mtc also called network meta analysis is an extension of traditional meta analysis to allow the simultaneous pooling of data from clinical trials comparing more than two. It is a userfriendly way of conducting stats without having to deal with the r code itself.
A primer on network metaanalysis for dental research. R help network metaanalysis, varconstpower in nlme. Buzkova p, lumley t 2008 semiparametric modeling of repeated measurements under outcomedependent followup. Performing armbased network metaanalysis in r with the. The statistical methodology underpinning this technique and software tools for implementing the methods are evolving. Running a network metaanalysis using winbugs youtube. Datavisualization methods are essential to explore and communicate meta analytic data and results. New software is needed that balances userfriendliness with statistical sophistication and provide builtin methodological guidance. First, is the bucher method 45 which is a single or repeated comparison of a closed loop of threetreatments such that one of them is common to the two studies. Network metaanalysis of randomized trials on the safety of. Network metaanalysis proposed by lumley open loops metaanalysis. Network metaanalysis synthesizes direct and indirect evidence in a network of trials that compare multiple interventions and has the potential to rank the competing treatments according to the studied outcome. Jul 17, 2014 by joseph rickert broadly speaking, a meta analysis is any statistical analysis that attempts to combine the results of several individual studies.
Network metaanalysis combines direct and indirect evidence to better define risk or benefit. Since the term and modern approaches to research synthesis were first introduced in the 1970s, meta analysis has had a. Lumley t 2002 network meta analysis for indirect treatment comparisons statistics in medicine 21. Demystifying trial networks and network metaanalysis the bmj. Higgins, and lumley 2018 of the commoneffect model.
Thomas lumley meta and guido schwarzer meta propose macros for r software. However, at the moment the effect sizes have to be entered into the software beforehand jasp cannot calculate this for you. Both commercial and freely available statistical software packages have been. Mixed treatment comparisons, a special case of network metaanalysis, combine. Methodological considerations in network metaanalysis. The use of network meta analysis has increased dramatically in recent years. Dec 26, 2014 network metaanalysis nma a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments in the same metaanalysis simultaneously has become increasingly popular in the medical literature in recent years. Two new methods to fit models for network metaanalysis. Likelihood of the empirical distribution function as an approach to bayesian analysis of survey data. To conduct a metaanalysis in jasp, be sure to check our their guide. It is based on a methodological framework described in 1 which considers six domains. The cran meta analysis task view is exceptionally wellorganized listing r.
Prediction intervals for randomeffects metaanalysis. Jul 17, 2014 however, r is the natural platform for meta analysis both because of the myriad possibilities for statistical analyses that are not generally available through the specialized software, and because of the many packages devoted to various aspects of meta analysis. A practical guide to network meta analysis with examples and code in the evaluation of healthcare, rigorous methods of quantitative assessment are necessary to establish which interventions are effective and costeffective. Unlike r, stata software needs to create relevant ado scripts at. However, at the moment the effect sizes have to be entered.
For software free introduction to meta analysis, see meta intro. What is a network metaanalysis and what is its role in. Meta analysis is a valuable tool for combining evidence from multiple studies. In the last decade, network metaanalysis nma and multiple treatment. But first, let us consider the idea behind bayesian in inference in general, and the bayesian hierarchical model for network meta analysis in particular. This guide shows you how to conduct meta analyses in r from scratch. Bayesian frameworks, with different software packages. After that, lumley developed an indirect treatment comparison.
It is the method in which multiple interventions that is, three or more are compared using both direct comparisons of interventions within randomized controlled trials and indirect comparisons. Often when performing a meta analysis on the effectiveness of certain interventions, we are less interested in the question if one particular intervention is effective e. Jasp is a free, opensource program used to perform statistical analysis tests by using r packages. An early source is thomas lumley s article network meta analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Jansen jp, trikalinos t, cappelleri jc, daw j, andes s, eldessouki r, salanti g. Many combinations of direct or indirect interactions. To estimate metaanalysis models, the opensource statistical environment r is quickly becoming a popular choice. Chapter 11 network metaanalysis doing metaanalysis in r.
With a large number of novel graphs proposed quite recently, a comprehensive, uptodate overview of available graphing options for meta analysis is unavailable. Software for network meta analysis general purpose software. Cinema confidence in network meta analysis is a web application that simplifies the evaluation of confidence in the findings from network meta analysis. May 21, 2003 network meta analysis combines direct and indirect evidence to better define risk or benefit. Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive. Winbugs, openbugs, jags bayesian by far most used, most exible meta regression software frequentist multivariate meta analysis software frequentist e. Professor thomas lumley the university of auckland. It was designed for staff and collaborators of the protect lab, which is headed by prof. The second aspect is the question of when twosample tests are transitive.
The hard part is getting the estimation to fail when it should. However, the tapproximation is clearly inappropriate, and has a detrimental impact on the coverage probability. Jags is a program for analyzing bayesian hierarchical models using mcmc sim. Aug 30, 2002 network meta analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. A worked example of this network meta analysis is now available. Package meta may 4, 2020 title general package for meta analysis. Network meta analysis synthesizes direct and indirect evidence in a network of trials that compare multiple interventions and has the potential to rank the competing treatments according to the studied outcome. Conducting indirecttreatmentcomparison and networkmeta. The nma was conducted for efficacy american college of rheumatology acr.
Consistency and inconsistency in network metaanalysis. Network meta analysis is becoming more widely used as a means to compare multiple treatments in the same analysis. There are several assumptions for the network meta analysis to yield meaningful results 14. The random effect bayesian network meta analysis was performed using winbugs software version 1. Statistical software has been developed to fit network meta. Metafor package can also be used to conduct meta analyses under r. A microsoftexcelbased tool for running and critically. Assess the impact of publication bias on results with trimandfill analysis. A 10 minutes introduction to network meta analysis georgia. Using structural equation modeling for network metaanalysis. Two investigators identified the studies, abstracted data, and assessed the risk of bias independently. Adjusted indirect treatment comparison itc proposed by bucher simple indirect comparison. We have proposed the use of designbytreatment interaction models as an approach to identifying inconsistencies, or conflicts, in network metaanalysis evidence structures. Despite its usefulness network meta analysis is often criticized for its complexity and for being accessible only to researchers with strong statistical and computational skills.
Network metaanalysis nma a statistical technique that allows. Junyi wu, huiyun gu and chao zhang, software and package applicating for network meta. Currently, network meta analyses are undertaken either within the bayesian hierarchical linear models or frequentist generalized linear mixed models. The meta analytic community has contributed to this growth by developing numerous packages specific to metaanalysis. Network meta analysis nma is an extension of pairwise meta analysis that facilitates comparisons of multiple interventions over a single analysis. The term was apparently coined by statistician gene v glass in a 1976 speech he made to the american education research association. Other frequentist approaches are possible lumley t. It supports all major meta analysis methods, plus, uniquely, the inverse variance heterogeneity and quality effects models. Electrical stimulation for pain relief in knee osteoarthritis. Network meta analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. We agree with the conclusions of the network meta analysis of heart failure prevention by antihypertensive drugs, which used a bayesian technique and 26 clinical trials. A further development in the network meta analysis is to use a bayesian statistical approach. Jan 20, 2014 5 key things to know about metaanalysis. However, the learning curve for winbugs can be daunting, especially for new users.
For instance, consider a setting where there is interest in performing an indirect comparison between treatment a and treatment b. Declare, update, and describe meta data meta data declare meta analysis data. This is a universal assumption for all meta analysis, although some heterogeneity increases the. Petticrew et al 20 network meta analyses are best designed for. Software solutions are available in both stata and r. Lumley 18 described a maximumlikelihood approach using linear mixed. Since that time, not only has meta analysis become a fundamental tool in medicine, but it is also becoming popular.
Step by step instructions on how to run a network meta analysis using winbugs. The recent development and introduction of a new technique usually referred as network metaanalysis, indirect metaanalysis, multiple or mixed treatment comparisons has allowed the estimation of metrics for all possible comparisons in the same model, simultaneously gathering direct and indirect evidence. Network meta analysis is a popular way to combine results from several studies usually randomized trials comparing several treatments or interventions. For individual studies, important considerations include how patients were randomized to the treatments, whether both patients and outcome assessors were blind to the treatment and how missing data were handled. After that, lumley27 developed an indirect treatment comparison technique, known as network metaanalysis nma, to compare two treatments in the situation where an indirect comparison between two treatments of interest can be obtained through more than one common comparator or linking treatment. Lumley t 2002 network metaanalysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Network meta analysis of randomized trials on the safety of vascular closure devices for femoral arterial puncture site haemostasis.
Network meta analysis compares multiple interventions simultaneously by analyzing studies making different comparisons in the same analysis. There have also been useful discussion in a series of articles in the 2012 volume of the journal research synthesis methods volume 3 starting at page 80. We applied a multitiered search strategy to find the meta analytic graphs proposed and introduced so far. Lumley 48 developed network meta analysis to compare competing treatments not directly compared in trials. Despite its usefulness network metaanalysis is often criticized for its complexity and for being accessible only to researchers with strong statistical and computational skills. The focus of this guide is primarily on clinical outcome research in psychology. The software automatically generates models for network metaanalysis suitable for mcmc software, like winbugs, openbugs and jags. For more advanced meta analyses like meta regression, multilevel and network meta analysis the. The first assumption is homogeneity for standard meta analysis, that is, all ac trials are comparable and all bc trials are comparable. Network meta analysis multiple treatments meta analysis, mixed treatment comparisons attempts to make the best use of a set of studies comparing more than two treatments. Moreover, it can be used for subgroup analysis, moderator analysis, and publication bias analysis. A bayesian network metaanalysis to synthesize the influence. In the last decade, a new statistical methodology, namely, network meta analysis, has been developed to address limitations in traditional pairwise meta analysis. The ispor task force on indirect treatment comparisons good research practices is publishing its report as two articles.
But studies can get contradictory or misleading along the way. Most network metaanalyses to date use winbugs software, which is limited in. Furthermore, critical appraisal of network meta analyses conducted in winbugs can be. Dear thomas lumley, and rhelp list members, i have read your article network meta analysis for indirect treatment comparisons statist med, 2002. Often a single study will not provide the answers and it is desirable to synthesise evidence from multiple sources, usually randomised controlled trials. But for bayesian network metaanalysis to be of maximum utility in education research, there is a need for more multiple treatment studies to enhance researchers ability to a strengthen comparisons salanti et al. Terrin et al 49 and tang and liu 50 recently demonstrated that an asymmetrical christmas tree is only related to publication bias if the trials included are homogeneous and that registries are a good alternative approach. Network meta analysis incorporates all available evidence into a general statistical framework for comparisons of all available treatments. Winbugs, a freely available bayesian software package, has been the most widely used software package to conduct network meta analyses. This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.
Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta. Statistical software, 36, 148 amlodipine amlodipine for. Rank probabilities indicate the probability for each treatment to be best, second best, etc. Introduction to network metaanalysis a network metaanalysis sometimes called mixed or multiple treatments metaanalysis is a method for comparing more than two interventions, some of which may not have been compared directly headtohead in the same study fig. Metafor package can also be used to conduct metaanalyses under r. The approach allows for a global test for the presence of inconsistency, and models can readily be fitted in generalpurpose statistical software. A bayesian approach is not the only method to perform a network metaanalisis. Most network metaanalyses to date use winbugs software, which is limited in functionality and accessibility to the nonstatistician. Lumley tnetwork metaanalysis for indirect treatment. Network metaanalysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Metaanalysis and the science of research synthesis nature. It has usually been performed in a bayesian setting, but recently it has become possible in a frequentist setting using multivariate meta analysis and meta regression, implemented in stata.
Since that time, not only has meta analysis become a fundamental tool in medicine, but it is also. Use the meta suite of commands, or let the control panel interface guide you through your entire meta analysis. Network metaanalysis, also called multiple treatments metaanalysis or mixed treatment comparisons, is a. The problem with network analysis in regards to a meta analysis, is that a network meta analysis is more likely to be valid when analyzing very similar studies for very similar patient populations. In the following, we will describe how to perform a network meta analysis based on a bayesian hierarchical framework. Indicate software package used in the analysis and provide code at least in an.
1560 1395 1520 1326 495 1077 1235 1055 333 1066 1151 280 1352 1009 254 105 1213 263 669 926 551 180 184 980 241 1373 9 1422 293 785